Microsoft net threading problems

Search related threads. Remove From My Forums. Answered by:. Archived Forums V. Visual Basic Language. Not for VB6 0 0. Sign in to vote.

Hi, I'm a total newbie at the forums I'm not even sure how to explain this but I'll give it a shot. I have created an app that launches an external program. Exited, AddressOf ProcessExited now comes the tricky part.

EventArgs 'remove the handler to avoid being added more than once RemoveHandler proc. TextChanged If lblStatus. Sunday, November 27, PM. I am looking up invoke in google now Google wasn't much of a help here. I've look high and low for a simple solution, for now I will just add a timer that checks if the connection is still active and will enable the button when it's active.

I'll deal with this later. Thanks for your answer though! Monday, November 28, AM. For more information, see Destroying threads. The Thread. Abort method is not supported in. NET Core. If you need to terminate the execution of third-party code forcibly in. NET Core, run it in the separate process and use Process.

The System. CancellationToken is not available before. NET Framework 4. To stop a thread in older. NET Framework versions, implement the cooperative cancellation manually using the thread synchronization techniques. For example, you can create the volatile boolean field shouldStop and use it to request the code executed by the thread to stop.

For more information, see volatile in C Reference and System. Use the Thread. Join method to make the calling thread wait for the termination of the thread being stopped. You use the Thread. Sleep method to pause the current thread for a specified amount of time.

You can interrupt a blocked thread by calling the Thread. Interrupt method. For more information, see Pausing and interrupting threads. The following table presents some of the Thread properties:. Skip to main content. Feedback will be sent to Microsoft: By pressing the submit button, your feedback will be used to improve Microsoft products and services.

Privacy policy. This article helps you resolve the error that occurs where Windows Communication Foundation WCF service may scale up slowly under load. When your WCF service receives a burst of requests, the default. Depending on the execution time and number of requests received, you may notice the WCF execution-time increase linearly by approximately ms for each request received until the process has created sufficient IOCP threads to service the requests or sustain the incoming load.

The problem is more evident in services with longer execution times. The IOCP thread pool scalability problem is not typically observed upon the initial loading of the process. Three variables that have an impact on your WCF service ability to scale up at nearly the same rate as incoming requests.

GetMinThreads throttling value. This article describes how to resolve the problem with the. If you have throttling issues due to WCF throttling or the GetMinThreads value, this solution will not avoid those throttles. See the More information section below for guidance in identifying your scenario. The IOCP thread creation bug should be addressed in the next post 4.

NET Framework. This scalability problem does not exist in the. By moving the WCF service execution to another thread pool, you may incur a small amount of overhead implementing this solution. Performance results will vary per WCF Service.